SUMMATIVE+ASSESSMENT+RUBRIC

|| ||  ||  ||  Interactions and role assignments within each Team must be goal oriented to the tasks at hand and the final product. || - NO COLLABORATION OR LITTLE COLLABORATION EVIDENT - Compilation of information is weak or disconnected || - Some Collaboration is present - Compilation of information is some what connected and cohesive. || - Collaboration is evident. - Compilation of information is connected and cohesive || - Collaboration is dynamic and productive - Compilation of information is connected and very cohesive. || This is the most important part of the WIKI. This is where you explain what you have learned - the science facts and ideas. || - Science concepts are not well developed, have errors, or are presented at an inappropriate level - Very basic knowledge with few connections || - Concepts are clear, generally connected, and presented at an appropriate level - There are no errors in content || - Concepts are clear and connected - Presentation of concepts helps reader develop new insights || - Concepts are presented very clearly and are carefully and creatively connected - WIKI READERS will be challenged to think || A good WIKI PAGE will have graphics that are interesting and very connected to the concepts and ideas that are being presented. || - Graphics are limited or poorly done - Graphics are not useful for illustrating the concepts || - Graphics are accurate and clear - Graphics are useful in supporting science concepts || - Graphics are creative, accurate and clear - Graphics support science concepts very well || - Graphics are excellent and clever - Graphics are inherent to the conceptual understanding || EXPLANATION OF REASONING & UNDERSTANDING OF EACH TEAM’S GENETIC DISORDER INFORMATION: WHY OR WHY NOT FEDERAL FUNDING SHOULD BE ALLOTTED TO THE DISORDER CLEARLY EXPLAINED & REASONED || - DISCUSSION is rather messy with grammatical errors - EXPLANATION is erratic, too complex, inconsistent
 * Criteria **
 * Criteria **
 * Inadequate **
 * Adequate **
 * Competent **
 * Outstanding ** ||
 * __**COLLABORATION**__
 * **__BODY OF WIKI INFORMATION__**
 * **__ILLUSTRATIONS and/or GRAPHICS__** (OPTIONAL)
 * **__DISCUSSION__**

LITTLE OR NO DISCUSSION FOR EACH TEAM’S DISORDER || - DISCUSSION is mostly neat and is grammatically accurate - EXPLANATION is clear and consistent

SOME DISCUSSIONS POSTED BUT NOT FOR ALL TEAMS || - DISCUSSION is very neat and grammatically accurate -EXPLANATION is clear and consistent

DISCUSSIONS PRESENT WITH SATISFACTORY CONTENT || DISCUSSION IS ABOVE AND BEYOND IN SCOPE AND DEPTH OF UNDERSTANDING - EXPLANATION is very neat, clear, & CONSISTENT

ALL DISCUSSIONS COMPLETED WITH EXCELLENCE || PROPER CITATIONS OF ALL ONLINE INFORMATIONAL SOURCES || - RESOURCES are missing || - SOME RESOURCS PRESENT, BUT IMPROPERLY CITED || - RESOURCES are present CITATIONS ARE MOSTLY ACCURATE || - RESOURCES are present CITATIONS PERFECT ||
 * **__RESOURCES__**